|
|
The source spaces of the light quantum having two hyperspaces. 22+3 source locations. |
. |
We show it because of the intelligibility here the two-hyperspace's the dimension system of a space-time, and here the dimension stairs of the constant change of the dimension construction. This spread in our folk art. On this figure three from each other slipped space-time system visible. In the black lanes labeled with 0 in that space-time just nonspace - nontime a state reigns. In the upper row the current dimension can be read, it 0,1,2,3,4,5,5,5, 4,3,2,1, 0 signal it though, that then when 1,1,1,1,1 (throughout unidimensional) there is a state, then in the other space (in the current hyperspace) pacing dimension sources go over after each other our space-time one (central and common) his dimension place, and it is shaken up with this the own one (just becoming extinct) non-matreial dimensio-essences, spread all over then the other space-time part, they recur in a row. |
|
It can be seen in our small pyramid-like figure that the dimension number never rises above 5. That is why that gray gate can be seen in the middle on the pyramid. Space is 5 dimensional for three times spans. You can work it out if you step trough five sources on the three diamonds figure above. In reality, the three diamonds are in one place, it is easier to follow the creation process of space in this way. The Water type transporter point is represented in this figure now at the intersection of the body diagonals of the octahedrons (blue). This is the dragon’s heart, which is not tachyon, but a pulsing, pumping, stationary source (the princess), whose duty is the forwarding of existence. |
The Fotino, is LIGHT
|
|
A good evidence for this can be found in our BABEL section. I also highlighted the details of Labat dictionary there. But he who calls the Sun a star had a knowledge far greater than what they teach about the ancients in our days. He also regarded it as a star. Looking at it from elsewhere, viewed from a distance. Seen from there it is indeed star. But why would he have named and designated it as a star otherwise? It does not a least bit resemble to its remote brothers! Maybe he knew? More than suspicious. |
|
|
|
There are no two identical snowflakes, yet by the billions do they fall from the sky. In most cases they have a sixfold symmetry, and only rarely do we find ones that are different among them. In addition to the wonderful diversity it is also characteristic that some of their branches show high similarity to each other, for which it is even more difficult to find a reason. |
ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED © 2007 UNIVERSUM UNIVERSITAS. This publication was prepared for
personal use only. Translation © Varga Péter (email: vargatranslation@gmail.com) |